Support us
Open-source intelligence helps reporters examine atrocities where cameras cannot safely reach. Satellite imagery and local footage may reveal strike patterns, troop movements or unlawful treatment. Their value depends on verification: what is visible, when and where, and what independent records support. An image alone does not establish a war crime.
For Australian journalists, this work often runs from Sydney or Melbourne newsrooms to conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, while local reporters carry much of the risk. Australian English, regional laws and audience expectations shape the final story. Translation, legal framing and cultural fluency are part of verification.
A sound inquiry starts with a question, not a suspect. Define the alleged conduct under international humanitarian law, separate observation from inference and identify evidence that could disprove it. Use lawful public material, preserve originals and record each step. Where identification is uncertain, say so rather than converting suspicion into a finding.
Source safety must be planned before collection. A geotag, building, plate, routine or voice can expose an evidence provider, even if their identity is unknown. The aim is a defensible public record: enough detail for scrutiny, but no extra detail that could identify a witness, survivor or local partner.
Identify the event, conduct and legal standard first. Attacks on civilians, indiscriminate bombardment, pillage and torture each require different evidentiary links. Distinguish individual acts from command responsibility and reporting from legal adjudication. Seek Australian legal advice before publishing allegations that could raise defamation, privacy or contempt concerns.
Map sources and their independence. Useful material may include imagery, court records, humanitarian data, local monitors and specialists. The Free Press Foundation is a Ukrainian nonprofit supporting independent journalism, conflict reporting and media education, and a useful reference for newsroom training.
Work from copies, not the only version of a file. Download originals where lawful, calculate a hash and record timestamps, platform, URL and collection method. Keep a chain-of-custody log and preserve machine-readable files; screenshots often discard metadata and context.
Test location and time through landmarks, shadows, weather, vegetation, roads and historical imagery. Compare findings with fire, displacement and weather records, remembering that missing open data is not proof nothing happened. Use chronolocation and geolocation to date each item, assign confidence and list plausible alternatives.
Source-first discipline extends beyond conflict reporting. In traditional medicine and sovereignty, policy claims require primary evidence and context rather than headline acceptance. Apply the same rule to military claims, displacement figures and attack narratives, and record corrections.
Local knowledge reveals what a frame cannot: whether a building is a clinic, a road is busy, or a reported weapon fits the scene. Ask trusted local experts about specific propositions without exposing them, separating their assessment of place, time and context from conclusions about culpability.
Culture needs checking too. In Sydney, “AFL” is readily understood, while in Washington it may mean little; in Australian cricket, “a six” is a maximum. The Foundation's baseball and cricket guide reminds international teams that familiar metaphors are not universal.
Australian access is jurisdiction-specific. Federal, NSW, Victorian, Queensland and local agencies apply different records and freedom-of-information rules. The ABC, commercial outlets and regional newspapers form distinct parts of the local media market; each may hold context national desks lack.
Do not ask a source to reveal more than the claim requires. Generalise precise home, office or shelter locations, and remove backgrounds, number plates, tattoos, scars and voice characteristics that permit re-identification. A public account is not automatically safe: do not comment or contact in ways that link someone to your inquiry.
Keep identity data separate from evidence. Use encrypted channels for sensitive exchanges, remove identifying metadata from working copies and agree a retention schedule. Explain what can and cannot be guaranteed, because no tool makes a source invisible. For serious risks, consult specialist digital-security or legal-aid support.
Further material on responsible media and human-rights work is available through MHP JNAC. Use it to complement training on metadata, coercive requests and pressure to verify identity. If disclosure could trigger retaliation, delay publication or omit non-essential detail.
A publishable account should let readers inspect the reasoning without exposing people. State the claim and legal issue, explain the evidence and acknowledge unknowns. Distinguish observation, expert assessment and inference; include dates, time zones and units.
Before publication complete this verification pass:
Before release complete this source-safety pass:
Offer a secure tip route, publish corrections transparently and ask authorities precise questions without identifying the source. Reporting can expose an atrocity without turning a witness into a target, and that balance should remain visible in the editorial process.
