Support us
Journalists covering Ukraine, elections and conflict zones often face threats that continue long after a story is published. Doxxing—the malicious release of personal information such as a home address, phone number or family details—can turn public-interest reporting into a direct safety risk.
Free Press Foundation works with technology companies to reduce that risk through practical security measures, training and responsible information sharing. Our approach connects journalists, engineers, editors and civil society groups rather than treating online abuse as an isolated problem.
For Australian readers, the issue is close to home. Reporters in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and regional communities use social platforms, messaging apps and cloud services every day. Protecting their private information is essential to a resilient and independent media sector.
A safety partnership begins with a threat assessment. We help journalists identify which details may expose them: property records, relatives’ social profiles, vehicle registrations, old usernames, leaked passwords or images containing location data.
The assessment also considers the reporter’s beat and public profile. An investigative journalist, election correspondent or reporter working near a conflict area may face coordinated harassment from several countries. A local Australian reporter covering protests or organised crime may instead face pressure from a small but persistent online network.
Technology companies can make protective settings easier to find and use. Account security dashboards, multi-factor authentication, login alerts and recovery controls should be understandable to a journalist working under deadline, not hidden behind technical language.
We also encourage providers to review default data collection. Location history, contact syncing and public profile information can create a detailed picture of a reporter’s life. Limiting unnecessary retention and giving users clear deletion options reduces the material available to people seeking to identify or intimidate them.
Secure cloud storage is particularly important when journalists hold interview notes, source details, photographs or evidence from a war zone. Access should be based on roles, with encryption, strong authentication and detailed records showing who opened or shared a file.
Our work on this issue is explained in secure cloud for journalists. The goal is a system that protects sensitive reporting without making collaboration impossible for distributed newsrooms, freelance correspondents and trusted partners.
When private information appears online, time matters. We work with platforms and technology partners to establish clear channels for urgent reports, including requests to remove exposed addresses, phone numbers, identity documents and information about children.
A useful response process should preserve evidence while limiting further distribution. Platforms can review reposts, search visibility, recommendation systems and linked accounts. Journalists need to know what will happen next, who is handling the case and how to appeal if an initial decision is wrong.
Tools are only effective when people know how to use them. Our training covers password managers, phishing, device updates, secure messaging, social media privacy and safe handling of photos and documents.
Training also addresses behaviour under pressure. Reporters may be tempted to respond publicly to an abusive account or reveal information while defending their work. Guidance from experienced correspondents helps them make safer choices. Our programme on war correspondent skills links field reporting with personal and digital security.
Australian newsrooms operate under the Privacy Act 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles, while the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner provides guidance on personal information and data breaches. These rules are important, though they do not eliminate every form of online harassment or guarantee that a platform will remove harmful content quickly.
The eSafety Commissioner also provides pathways for dealing with serious online abuse. Technology companies must understand how their reporting systems interact with Australian law, including the practical needs of journalists in small regional outlets. A reporter in a remote community may have fewer editorial resources and limited access to specialist legal advice than a large Sydney newsroom.
The Australian technology market includes global platforms, local publishers, cloud providers, telecommunications companies and smaller security firms. Each controls a different part of the information chain. Effective protection depends on cooperation between them rather than a single product or moderation team.
Free Press Foundation brings the perspective of journalists and media activists into those discussions. We seek partnerships that respect editorial independence, protect confidential sources and avoid collecting more personal data than necessary. By combining responsible design, rapid response and continuous education, tech companies can help journalists report freely without forcing them to sacrifice their personal safety.
