Support us
Public records laws can help journalists verify claims, trace decisions and find documents officials may prefer to keep quiet. In Ukraine, wartime access is more than a specialist privilege: it is a way to test public authority while fighting remains dangerous.
The Free Press Foundation funds and promotes independent reporting and shares practical education with journalists and media activists. Visitors can learn about its projects and support its work through donations, which sustains reporting where commercial markets are least reliable.
Our training for journalists on using public records laws in wartime focuses on practical access rather than abstract rights. Participants frame, submit and challenge information requests without exposing sources or sensitive operational details.
For Australian readers, the subject offers a useful comparison. Commonwealth, state and territory systems differ, yet reporters in Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne all depend on official documents to hold governments accountable.
Ukraine’s Law on Access to Public Information continues to matter under martial law, although agencies may invoke lawful restrictions for national security, privacy and active investigations. The aim is accountable, proportionate access, not unrestricted disclosure.
Budgets, procurement files, council minutes and internal directives can reveal how public money is used and whether official explanations match administrative reality. For investigative desks, these papers often provide the timeline interviews alone cannot.
Training helps journalists identify which body holds a record, separate public information from protected data, and turn vague refusals into specific requests or review options. It reduces wasted time while lowering unnecessary legal risk.
Sessions combine legal principles with newsroom scenarios. Participants draft requests, record dates and agencies, build evidence logs, and analyse responses that may be delayed, partially answered or refused.
Wartime adds a security lens. A request can reveal a reporter’s location, source network or investigation, so trainers discuss metadata, secure channels and editorial or legal review before submission.
The foundation’s school media literacy campaign illustrates the wider principle: people need practical skills to interrogate information, not simply access to it. Checking claims helps journalists test whether a refusal can be lawfully reviewed.
A disciplined workflow helps teams move quickly without cutting corners. Before sending a request, check the legal route, audience, deadline and consequences of disclosure.
After a response arrives, preserve the original material and test every part of the answer.
Australia has no single FOI regime. The Commonwealth uses the Freedom of Information Act 1982, with oversight by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, while states and territories operate separate laws and commissioners. Reporters must identify the right public authority before filing.
The market brings together the public-service ABC, metropolitan mastheads, digital publishers and regional outlets, all using official records in different ways. Canberra’s federal departments hold current national records, while the National Archives of Australia preserves older material under separate access rules. NSW State Archives in Sydney and Public Record Office Victoria in Melbourne hold important state material.
Parliamentary committees, ombudsmen and audit offices can also supply evidence. Australian newsrooms know that a “fair dinkum answer” needs a traceable basis. That local shorthand for an honest reply captures a useful standard: connect every assertion to minutes, a contract or another verifiable document. A guide to mobile DJ insurance offers the same lesson about checking exclusions and proof.
A records request is not an anonymous search. Routine questions can expose a source when a document’s subject is sensitive or the request draws attention to one agency. Reporters should separate story needs from curiosity.
Editors can reduce risk by reviewing requests, agreeing on neutral wording and limiting circulation of personal information. If records contain source identifiers, unsafe metadata or details about protected sites, redaction and restricted circulation may be appropriate.
Access rules are strongest when applied consistently. Training treats refusal as a documented decision to examine, not automatically as defeat. That preserves the law’s purpose and the reporter’s safety.
Public-interest information work requires time, legal knowledge and secure infrastructure. Foundation support can cover training, travel, translation, secure storage and verification, including reporting from conflict-affected regions.
Independent media face war, political influence, financial stress and threats to staff. A community arts funding guide shows how local fundraising can sustain civic activity; the same principle helps newsrooms pursue accountability through shared resources and public backing.
For Australian donors, project pages show how contributions can support a request, secure workshop or media-literacy lesson. Backing practical work helps build a public capable of demanding evidence.
The strongest result is not a folder of obtained files. It is a reporting culture that treats official records as evidence to be tested, explained and placed in context. Journalists gain durable skills, and institutions become more accustomed to answering clearly.
These habits travel across borders. A reporter in Kyiv applying a narrow request, a Canberra reporter checking a procurement decision and an Australian fact-checker tracing a viral claim can use the same discipline: specify the claim, obtain the record and preserve a transparent trail.
