Support us
The first thing I remember was not the explosion but the silence afterwards. Kyiv had been loud with engines, shouted instructions and distant artillery. Then, from the hospital bed, I could hear only the wheels of a trolley and the soft click of a nurse checking the drip.
Before the injury, my notebook travelled everywhere: under a body-armour strap, inside a damp coat, beside a phone charging from a power bank. I wrote for readers who needed more than battlefield spectacle. They needed to know which roads were open, where families were sheltering and how local officials were responding.
I often thought about Australia while recording those details. In Sydney or Melbourne, news arrives between a morning coffee, a train journey and the ABC bulletin. Here, every update could affect whether someone crossed a street, entered a basement or tried to reach a relative in another district.
The morning began with ordinary reporting. I had planned interviews with residents, a check on transport routes and a short piece about emergency volunteers. Kyiv’s markets were still negotiating over bread, batteries and bottled water, while phone networks struggled under the pressure of thousands of calls.
My notes became less orderly when the shelling intensified. A voice message from a colleague arrived with a link to a suspicious commercial page about affiliate tracking systems, an example of the digital noise competing with urgent information. Even in a crisis, search results fill with advertising, copied text and misleading claims.
The blast came near the building where I was working. I remember dust in my mouth, a sudden pain in my leg and the stubborn thought that I had to save the recorder. A reporter’s equipment is replaceable, but the testimony inside it may disappear when witnesses scatter.
At the hospital, time lost its shape. Morning rounds, medication and the changing light through the window became my clock. I could not walk to a damaged street, yet people kept sending photographs, voice notes and descriptions of what they had seen.
I checked each account against at least one other source. A message from a neighbour was valuable, but it was still a single account. Local authorities could confirm movement restrictions; medics could explain injuries; residents could describe what official statements left out. That patient comparison mattered more than speed.
The emotional cost was harder to measure. War correspondents are trained to watch for danger, not always to recognise what danger leaves behind. My own experience echoed the concerns described in this report on journalist mental health, especially the way exhaustion can quietly weaken judgement.
The most useful updates did not always come from major broadcasters. In villages cut off by damaged roads or unstable mobile coverage, radio amateurs sometimes became the link between residents, aid groups and newsrooms. Their messages were brief, practical and usually rooted in what someone had physically observed.
The value of that work is captured in this account of radio amateurs connecting frontline communities with reporters. From my bed, I learned to treat every transmission as a lead rather than a finished story, recording the time, location and limits of the information.
The discipline would be familiar to Australian journalists covering floods in Queensland or bushfires outside Perth. A local message can save lives, but it must be checked against emergency services, weather data and the latest official advice.
My phone became a narrow window onto the war. I watched footage frame by frame, compared street signs and studied shadows to estimate when a recording had been made. A quiet website about a distant landscape, such as the Michinoku Kawa site, reminded me how radically the internet can place peaceful and violent realities beside one another.
Digital verification was not an abstract technical exercise. False reports could send families towards a closed bridge or expose a volunteer’s location. I stored original files, preserved timestamps and avoided publishing identifying details when doing so might put someone at risk.
Australia’s media environment has its own pressures. Newsrooms operate within defamation law, privacy expectations and the News Media Bargaining Code, while audiences increasingly encounter stories through social platforms rather than printed papers. Those rules do not remove the need for judgement; they make careful sourcing more important.
When I finally left the hospital, Kyiv did not look like the city I had entered. Some streets were scarred, some shops had reopened and people were already rebuilding routines around uncertainty. At a market stall, a vendor argued over the price of potatoes with the same energy Australians might reserve for supermarket specials or a delayed commuter train.
My diary contained no single heroic moment. It held fragments: a nurse sharing tea, a driver turning back from a blocked road, a child asking whether the electricity would return, and a radio operator repeating a location until help arrived. Those details gave the battle a human scale.
The work of independent journalism is to preserve such fragments without turning suffering into decoration. For reporters, editors and media supporters, the following practices helped protect accuracy and people’s safety:
A hospital bed narrowed my physical world, but it sharpened my understanding of reporting. The strongest account was rarely the loudest one. It was the record that remained precise, humane and useful after the sirens stopped.
