Support us
When a Ukrainian village is liberated, restoring reliable information can be as important as repairing roads, schools and power lines. Residents may have lived under occupation, relied on controlled broadcasts, or lost contact with trusted journalists. Children return to classrooms carrying rumours, fear and questions that cannot be answered by a single textbook.
The Impact of Our Media Literacy Workshops in Schools in Newly Liberated Villages is measured through everyday changes: students pause before sharing a video, ask who created a claim, compare several sources and recognise emotional manipulation. For an Australian audience familiar with ABC verification, SBS reporting and conversations about misinformation during elections, these skills may seem familiar. In recently liberated communities, they can support safety, trust and democratic participation.
Our workshops give students practical ways to assess information rather than telling them which opinions to hold. They learn to distinguish a verified report from an anonymous Telegram post, identify edited photographs and check whether a headline is supported by evidence. Exercises use age-appropriate examples connected to local news, humanitarian aid and community announcements.
The classroom itself becomes a safe place for discussion. Students can describe what they heard during occupation without being pressured to disclose personal experiences. Teachers are shown how to manage disagreement, protect vulnerable children and encourage careful language. This matters in small villages where families know one another and an unverified allegation can spread quickly through a shop, church group or messaging app.
A central activity asks students to follow a claim back to its original source. They compare publication dates, bylines, images and official statements, then record what remains unknown. The habit is simple but powerful: uncertainty is treated as a reason to investigate, not as permission to invent an answer.
Sport provides an accessible way to explain misleading comparisons and missing context. A lesson might examine how different rules shape what counts as success, using this clear explainer on baseball and cricket. Australian students might connect with the example through weekend cricket, local clubs and the relaxed phrase “having a bat”, while Ukrainian pupils see that familiar words can hide important differences.
We assess progress through short source-checking tasks before and after a workshop series. Students may be asked to classify a post, locate supporting evidence and explain why a source appears credible. Teachers also report whether pupils are asking more precise questions, correcting false claims respectfully and waiting for confirmation before forwarding alarming material.
The results are rarely dramatic overnight, and that is why follow-up matters. In some schools, students create wall guides for checking news or produce short announcements for classmates. Others practise interviewing a local official, aid worker or journalist. These activities turn media literacy into a shared community skill rather than a one-off lesson delivered by visitors.
Newly liberated villages face gaps in equipment, staffing and reliable connectivity. Workshops therefore include offline materials that teachers can reuse when electricity or internet access is interrupted. Printed source-checking cards, radio examples and group exercises help keep the programme useful in classrooms with limited resources.
This challenge has a wider relevance for Australia, where access can also vary between inner-city schools and remote communities across the Northern Territory or regional Queensland. Discussions about unequal educational opportunity often refer to wealth and education, but the Ukrainian experience adds another dimension: information access can be shaped by occupation, displacement and the destruction of local institutions.
A strong workshop does not leave students alone with abstract rules. It introduces them to the work of reporters who verify documents, protect sources and explain what is known. Where security permits, journalists and media trainers describe how they check eyewitness accounts, satellite images and official statements before publication.
Teachers also become part of the long-term network. They receive lesson ideas, updates about emerging manipulation tactics and guidance for discussing conflict-related content without amplifying harmful rumours. Broader place-based education resources, such as a Colorado learning example, can offer useful comparisons, while the foundation adapts methods to Ukrainian language, culture and post-occupation realities.
For communities rebuilding public life, a student who checks a claim can influence parents, neighbours and local groups. A classroom conversation may prevent a rumour from damaging trust in aid distribution or a legitimate election report. By supporting independent journalism and practical education, Free Press Foundation helps young people participate in Ukraine’s recovery with curiosity, caution and confidence.
