Support us
The Story Behind Our Map Documenting Every Attack on Ukrainian Media Infrastructure began with a practical problem: vital evidence about damaged newsrooms, broadcast facilities, printing houses, transmitters, and editorial offices was scattered across local reports, official statements, journalists’ testimonies, and public records.
When media infrastructure is attacked, the damage reaches beyond buildings and equipment. Communities can lose access to verified information, emergency updates, and reporting that holds powerful actors accountable. A visual record helps show where these disruptions occur, how they affect journalists, and why independent reporting needs sustained protection.
Our map is designed as a living research project rather than a static gallery of incidents. Each entry preserves context, identifies the affected media outlet or facility, and distinguishes confirmed information from details that still require verification.
War-related damage to media infrastructure is often described as a secondary consequence of fighting. That framing can conceal its wider impact. When a newsroom is destroyed or a transmitter is disabled, residents may be left without local reporting precisely when reliable information is most necessary.
A geographic map makes these events easier to understand together. It can reveal repeated pressure on particular regions, the vulnerability of rural broadcasters, and the ways attacks affect different parts of the information chain—from reporting and editing to printing, transmission, and distribution.
The project covers physical strikes, fires linked to hostilities, occupation-related seizures, deliberate destruction, and other incidents that prevent a media organization from operating normally. The scope includes facilities and equipment, not just injuries or threats directed at individual journalists.
We record an incident only when it can be supported by credible evidence. Relevant material may include newsroom documentation, photographs, videos, court or government records, reputable media reports, and direct accounts from journalists. If details conflict, the entry reflects that uncertainty instead of presenting an unverified claim as fact.
Creating a reliable incident record requires more than placing a pin on a map. Researchers compare dates, locations, outlet names, damage descriptions, and sources. They also check whether several reports describe the same event, preventing duplicate entries from distorting the overall picture.
This approach connects field reporting with data journalism. Our data journalism methods help turn fragmented evidence into information that can be checked, updated, and used by journalists, researchers, advocates, and communities.
| Information Layer | What It Shows | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Location and date | Where and when an incident occurred | Establishes a verifiable timeline |
| Media facility | The outlet, newsroom, transmitter, or printing site affected | Identifies the information function disrupted |
| Type of damage | Destruction, fire, seizure, equipment loss, or interruption | Clarifies the nature of the attack |
| Sources and status | Evidence supporting the entry and any unresolved questions | Protects accuracy and transparency |
| Community impact | Lost broadcasts, suspended publishing, or reduced access to news | Connects infrastructure damage to public life |
Viewed individually, attacks on media facilities can appear isolated. Viewed collectively, they show how pressure on journalism follows the broader geography of war. Some areas experience repeated damage, while others face prolonged interruptions caused by occupation, damaged power systems, or the loss of distribution routes.
The map also helps identify forms of harm that may receive less attention than a destroyed building. A stolen archive, damaged studio equipment, or an interrupted local broadcast can weaken a newsroom for months. Recording these consequences makes the cost of information disruption more visible.
A carefully sourced archive supports accountability. It can help investigators establish timelines, assist journalists reporting on attacks against the press, and give affected media organizations a documented record of losses. It also preserves evidence that may become harder to locate as news cycles move on and physical sites change.
Documentation has an immediate public value as well. Independent media need the capacity to continue working during crises, respond quickly to breaking events, and investigate what happened. Our rapid response fund supports that kind of urgent journalism when speed and verification are equally important.
Researchers can use the dataset to examine trends in attacks on journalism and compare incidents across locations or time periods. Media organizations can draw on it when seeking assistance, documenting damage, or explaining why rebuilding a newsroom involves much more than replacing a few devices.
For the public, the map offers a direct way to see the human and civic consequences of attacks on information infrastructure. It reminds us that a local newsroom is part of a community’s resilience: it connects people to verified facts, records events, and gives residents a platform when ordinary channels of communication fail.
The map depends on careful research, continued updates, and cooperation with journalists in affected regions. Readers can help protect the quality and reach of this work by:
Every verified record strengthens the public history of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the effort to defend independent journalism. Explore the map, share its findings, and support the Free Press Foundation so that attacks on the country’s information infrastructure are documented rather than forgotten.
